DTMe TAE THE NAVY
come
PPEOCTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR05131-13
22 September 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18
September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command
Office of Legal Counsel (PERS-00J) of 21 February 2014, a copy of
which was provided to your counsel and is being provided to you now.
Additionally, the Board considered your counsel's response to the
advisory opinion dated 25 August 2014.
However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion.’ Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
1 whe Board did note the error in the advisory opinion which refers to paragraph 11(b)
of enclosure (6) to reference (ob), which is the Secretary of the Navy Instruction
(SECNAVINST) 1920.6C. The correct enclosure was (8) vice (6), “Boara of Inquiry
Procedures", dated 15 December 2005. However, the change in enclosure number did not
alter the facts in the advisory opinion for the Retirement Grade Determination.
| 7a
is
pocket No.NRObIS1
yim |
Als VUlse dren ee see
rate the existence of
when applying for a Corteehs UL
plicant to demonst
Consequently,
record, the burden is on the ap
probable material error or injustice.
COV IMAM SL
r
ROBERT J. ONETLL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5030 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5099 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4625 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in Docket NOo.NKU4S62b~-14 this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2156 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. 4 However after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9942 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4147 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval the burden is om the applicant record, probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4190 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9649 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NR09649-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5153 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.